As. Turk et al., Evaluation of the TriSpan neck bridge device for the treatment of wide-necked aneurysms - An experimental study in canines, STROKE, 32(2), 2001, pp. 492-496
Background and Purpose-Many wide-necked aneurysms are difficult or impossib
le to treat with the Guglielmi detachable coil (GDC). The purpose of this s
tudy was to evaluate the use of a neck bridging device, the TriSpan coil, i
n combination with standard GDCs for the treatment of wide-necked aneurysms
in an experimental canine aneurysm model.
Methods-Of 24 experimental aneurysms in 12 animals, 19 (7 lateral and 12 te
rminal) were treated with the TriSpan coil in conjunction with standard GDC
s. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed on all animals immed
iately after treatment. In 6 animals, follow-up DSA and histological evalua
tion were performed 3 weeks after treatment. In the remaining 6, DSA was do
ne at both 90 and 180 days after treatment. Histological evaluation was don
e immediately after the 180-day angiographic evaluation.
Results-The TriSpan was easy to use in conjunction with the standard GDC, B
ecause of their geometry, some lateral aneurysms were difficult or impossib
le to treat with this device. Greater than 90% aneurysm occlusion was obtai
ned in all 19 aneurysms. In no instance was there evidence of coil migratio
n, herniation, or aneurysm recanalization. Histological evaluation of the t
issue surrounding the TriSpan coil showed tissue responses similar to that
seen with standard GDCs.
Conclusions-These results show that the TriSpan coil in conjunction with st
andard GDCs can be used safely and effectively for the treatment of wide-ne
cked aneurysms in this canine model. Positioning and deployment of the neck
bridge in aneurysms having an acute angle with the long axis of their pare
nt artery are difficult or impossible. It is likely that this device, used
in conjunction with the standard GDC, will allow treatment of some wide-nec
ked aneurysms that are not treatable with the GDC alone.