Prospective study comparing human albumin vs. reinfusion of ultrafiltrate-ascitic fluid after total paracentesis in cirrhotic patients with tense ascites
D. Zaak et al., Prospective study comparing human albumin vs. reinfusion of ultrafiltrate-ascitic fluid after total paracentesis in cirrhotic patients with tense ascites, Z GASTROENT, 39(1), 2001, pp. 5-10
Although, total paracentesis associated with human albumin substitution has
shown to be a rapid, effective and safe treatment of diuretic refractory a
scites in advanced liver cirrhosis, it implies high costs and has a limited
availability. Therefore an alternative procedure the reinfusion of concent
rated ascites has gained popularity in recent years (Smart et al. 1990; Gra
zioto et al. 1997). It was the aim of the study to compare human albumin su
bstitution vs. reinfusion of ascitic-ultrafiltrate after total paracentesis
.
35 patients with cirrhosis and tense ascites received total paracentesis as
sociated with either human albumin (5-8 g/l ascites) (= group A) or reinfus
ion of an ascitic-ultrafiltrate fluid by means of hemofiltration technique
(= group B). The mean volume of ascites removed was 9.41 (2.1-20.0) in grou
p A and 11.41 (6.5-21.0) in group B. No significant differences in serum el
ectrolytes, liver and renal function, coagulation profiles and hormones of
the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system were observed during hospitalizati
on. In both groups sodium excretion increased significantly. 43 % of the pa
tients in group B developed pyrexia and chill after reinfusion of the ascit
ic-ultrafiltrate fluid. In one patient an anaphylactic bronchospasm occurre
d requiring IUC-treatment. The treatment cost in case of human albumin were
326.-DM vs. 290.-DM for each patient treated with ascitic-ultrafiltrate fl
uid reinfusion. The probabilities of hospital readmission and survival were
similar in both groups during followup.
The results indicate that i.v. infusion of ascitic-ultrafiltrate fluid is a
s effective as total paracentesis and albumin infusion in case of diuretic
refractory ascites. However, according to the costs of instruments and staf
f and due to the significant allergic reactions caused by ascitic fluid it
cannot be considered as a real alternative to albumin substitution.