Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) for emphysema: Initial experience at the University Hospital Gasthuisberg

Emphysema is a disabling disease, for which there is no curative therapy av ailable today. Lung transplantation offers a valuable option for a very sel ected number of patients, however, due to the enormous organ shortage, only few patients can be offered such a therapy. Recently there has been import ant resurgence of interest in lung volume reduction surgery and as a conseq uence, we have embarked in such a program. since may 1997. We have now perf ormed unilateral lung volume reduction surgery in 29 emphysema patients (25 on the right and 4 on the left side). Twenty-four patients were already di scharged home. There has been no perioperative mortality. The mean hospital stay was 19.8 +/- 11.4 days (range, 8-47 d). Twenty patients of whom we al ready have follow-up data during 6 months (m) form the further basis of thi s report. Six weeks after the procedure the FEV1 increased from 0.82 +/- 0.28 L (28 /- 8%) to 1.05 +/- 0.39 L, a mean increase of 28%. There was a further incr ease of the FEV1 to a maximum of 1.06 +/- 0.42, L at 6 m, a mean maximum in crease of 29% (p=0.0046, ANOVA). Similarly. the FVC increased from 2.80 +/- 1.10 L to 3.15 +/- 1.00 L, a mean increase of 12.5%. A further increase wa s also obtained at 6 m and was 19.6% (3.35 +/- 1.05 L, p=0.014. ANOVA). The maximum decrease in RV was obtained at 3 m (from 5.91 +/- 1.37 L to 4.37 /- 0.85 L (p=0.0001. ANOVA), a mean decrease of 26%. The maximum TLC decrea se was demonstrated at 3 m (from 8.71 +/- 1.71 L to 7.60 +/- 1.56 L (p=0.00 2, ANOVA). a mean decrease of 12.8%. Afterwards there was again a gradual r aise of the TLC. The six minute walking distance increased from 231 +/- 31 m to 272 +/- 34 m (p=NS) after pulmonary rehabilitation and to 416 +/- 77 m at 3 m and 415 +/- 18 m at 6 m (p=0.0002. ANOVA)after the operation. The q uality of life (measured with a standardized questionnaire, the Nottingham Health Profile) improved significantly in several domains (e.g, mobility, p ain, energy, emotions and social) at 3 m postoperatively. There was one late death (nt 6 m) due to an unknown cause. The actuarial su rvival rate was therefore 100% at 3 m and 95% at 12 m. In conclusion, unilateral thoracoscopic lung volume reduction surgery is a new and safe treatment modality for patients suffering from severe end-stag e emphysema. The objective and subjective improvement is marked and the mor tality is very low. Rigid selection criteria an, however, necessary to be a ble to guarantee an optimal result.