This paper contrasts two Ugandan cropping systems, a banana-based (Musa AAA
) and a grain-based (Zea mays and Sorghum bicolor), and focuses on the pote
ntial of each to provide food in sufficient quantity to meet household nutr
itional requirements. The objectives of this study were to estimate the amo
unt of energy, protein, vitamin A, Ca, Fe and Zn furnished by these two sys
tems; and to model cropping strategies capable of improving nutritional out
put given the same land area and location. Results show that both systems c
urrently fail to satisfy a range of nutritional needs with Zn and Ca defici
ts being the most extreme. Modifications in cropping strategies explored th
rough modeling showed that improved nutrition in both systems was possible
given the same resource base. Improved nutrition in the banana-cropping sys
tem requires major changes in the allocation of land: e.g, a two-thirds red
uction in the proportion of land devoted to banana. Adequate nutrition give
n the same resource base would require the incorporation of several species
(e.g. Amaranthus lividus and Glycine max), which though present are uncomm
on. Though we suggest changes in extant cropping systems, this paper acknow
ledges that such changes would occur in the context of practices embedded i
n cultural norms. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.