Background: Three patients with identical strains of M tuberculosis (TB) un
derwent bronchoscopy on the same day at hospital A.
Methods: We reviewed each patient's clinical history, hospital A's infectio
n control practices for bronchoscopies, and specimen and isolate handling a
t each of 3 laboratories involved. We searched for possible community links
between patients. Restriction fragment length polymorphism was performed o
n TB isolates.
Results: The first patient who underwent bronchoscopy had biopsy-confirmed
granulomatous pulmonary TB. A sputum sample collected from the third patien
t 6 weeks after the bronchoscopy produced an isolate with an identical rest
riction fragment length polymorphism pattern to isolates collected during t
he bronchoscopies. No evidence existed for community transmission or labora
tory contamination; the only common link was the bronchoscopy. Different br
onchoscopes were used for each patient. Hospital ventilation and wall-sucti
oning were functioning well. Respiratory technicians reported sometimes reu
sing the nozzles of atomizers on more than one patient. A possible mechanis
m for transmission was contamination from the first patient of the atomizer
ii it was used to apply lidocaine to the pharynx and nasal passages of oth
er patients.
Conclusions: A contaminated atomizer may have caused TB transmission during
bronchoscopy. Hospital A changed to single-use atomizers after this invest
igation.