E. Montgomery et al., Nuclear localization of Dpc4 (Madh4, Smad4) in colorectal carcinomas and relation to mismatch repair/transforming growth factor-beta receptor defects, AM J PATH, 158(2), 2001, pp. 537-542
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Research/Laboratory Medicine & Medical Tecnology","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
The tumor-suppressor protein Dpc4 (Smad4, Madh4) regulates gene expression.
On binding of an extracellular ligand of the extensive transforming growth
factor (TGF) superfamily to its cognate receptor complex, latent cytoplasm
ic Dpc4 is activated and translocated into the nucleus to function as part
of various DNA-binding transcriptional activator complexes, The most releva
nt ligand/receptor pair to control the tumor suppressive function of Dpc4 r
emains uncertain, but is usually assumed to be TGF-P and its heteromeric re
ceptor. We exploited a fortuitous experiment of nature to directly test thi
s hypothesis: the TGF-P type II receptor gene is inactivated by mutation in
nearly all colorectal carcinomas having microsatellite instability, as see
n in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) and in sporadic medu
llary colorectal cancers, Using a specific and sensitive immunohistochemica
l label for Dpc4, we examined nuclear localization of Dpc4 in 13 HNPCC, six
medullary, and 41 sporadic nonmedullary colorectal carcinomas. In agreemen
t with published rates, two (5%) of 41 sporadic tumors showed complete loss
of Dpc4 protein, indicative of genetic inactivation. All 13 HNPCC and six
medullary tumors had intact cytoplasmic and nuclear Dpc4 localization. The
TGFBR2 gene was sequenced in three of the cancers from patients with HNPCC,
and all of these harbored inactivating mutations, The specificity of the i
mmunohistochemical assay was demonstrated in xenograft tumors of syngeneic
cell lines that differed in DPC4 genetic status because of an engineered ge
ne knockout. Thus, nuclear localization of Dpc4 can be maintained in cells
with inactivated TGF-P type II receptors, suggesting the persistence of tum
or-suppressive action of an upstream signaling input, most likely a ligand/
receptor complex distinct from TGF-P, Identification of the relevant input
would be expected to have implications for the understanding of tumorigenes
is and the design of rational biological therapy.