B. Goffinet et al., The bryophyta (mosses): Systematic and evolutionary inferences from an rps4 gene (cpDNA) phylogeny, ANN BOTANY, 87(2), 2001, pp. 191-208
Phylogenetic analyses of nucleotide and amino acid sequences of the chlorop
last protein coding gene rps4 were performed for 225 species of mosses, rep
resenting 84 % of families recognized by Vitt (1984. In: Schuster RM, ed. N
ew manual of bryology, vol 2. Nichinan: Hattori Botanical Laboratory), unde
r the criterion of maximum parsimony with Takakia and Sphagnum as outgroups
. Most parsimonious topologies converge to a scenario wherein the Andreaeid
ae are monophyletic and sister to the Bryidae (peristomate mosses), the Nem
atodonteae and the Buxbaumiaceae form a monophyletic lineage, the Diphyscia
ceae are sister to the Arthrodonteae and, within the latter, the Funarineae
-Encalyptineae-Timmiaceae-Haplolepideae compose a monophyletic clade sister
to remaining diplolepideous mosses. This hypothesis suggests that early in
the evolution of the Arthrodonteae, two major lineages diverged, with oppo
site and alternate peristomes, respectively. Bootstrap support for the deep
dichotomies is poor or lacking but increases when protein translations of
rps4 sequences are included in the analysis. Several novel systematic hypot
heses are raised, including (a) a diplolepideous rather than haplolepideous
origin of the Pleurophascaceae; (b) an affinity of the Catascopiaceae with
the Funariineae rather than the Bryineae; and (c) a close relationship of
the Calomniaceae and Mitteniaceae to the Rhizgoniaceae. The advantages and
disadvantages of a single gene phylogeny are discussed with respect to the
identification of polyphyletic familial or suprafamilial taxa. (C) 2001 Ann
als of Botany Company.