Pj. Paterson et al., The combination of oral amphotericin B with azoles prevents the emergence of resistant Candida species in neutropenic patients, BR J HAEM, 112(1), 2001, pp. 175-180
The role of antifungal prophylaxis remains controversial and concerns exist
that the use of azoles may potentiate the emergence of resistant Candida s
pecies. We used a strategy of combining the latest azole/triazole with oral
amphotericin B to reduce this risk. We analysed data on Candida colonizati
on and candidaemia in neutropenic patients from four prophylaxis periods (1
985/6: ketoconazole and amphotericin B suspension; 1991/2 & 1997: fluconazo
le and amphotericin B suspension; 1998/9: itraconazole) to look for evidenc
e of the emergence of potentially resistant species. Overall, the percentag
e of patients colonized with Candida fell significantly (69.3%, 57.5%, 43.2
% and 46%, respectively, P < 0.001) due to a decrease in colonization with
C. albicans (49%, 23.1%, 22.2% and 25.2%, respectively, P < 0.001). However
, in 1998/9, increased colonization, particularly with C. glabrata in the l
ower gastrointestinal tract, was noted to coincide with the omission of ora
l amphotericin B. Despite an increasing population of 'high risk' patients,
the incidence of candidaemia has not changed significantly (2%, 1.4%, 1.2%
and 2% respectively). However, species causing candidaemia have changed, w
ith resistant organisms now predominating. Our findings support the use of
azole prophylaxis although, in view of the trends noted when itraconazole w
as used alone, we would recommend the additional use of oral amphotericin B
.