Objective: In lower-extremity surgery there are significant risks associate
d with the use of tourniquets. This prospective study was done to assess to
what extent these risks may be offset by the potential advantages of tourn
iquets, namely reductions in blood loss, length of hospital stay and compli
cation rates. Design: A prospective case study. Setting: A major urban hosp
ital. Patients: Sixty-three consecutive patients scheduled for primary ceme
nted total knee arthroplasty (TI(A)were blindly randomized into tourniqet (
n = 33) and non-tourniquet (n = 30) groups. Intervention: TI(A. during whic
h a pneumatic tourniquet was applied or not applied to control blood loss.
Main outcome measures: Perioperative blood loss, operating time, complicati
on rates, hospital stay and transfusion needs. Results: Differences in the
total measured blood loss, intraoperative blood loss and the Hemovac draina
ge blood loss between the 2 groups were not significantly different (p > 0.
25). The calculated total blood loss was actually lower in the non-tourniqu
et group (p = 0.02). Between the groups there were no statistical differenc
es in surgical time, length of hospital stay, transfusion requirements or r
ate of complications (although there was a trend to more complications in t
he tourniquet group (P = 0.06)). Conclusion: The effectiveness of a pneumat
ic tourniquet to control blood loss in TKA is questionable.