Dm. Levi et al., IMPROVEMENT IN VERNIER ACUITY IN ADULTS WITH AMBLYOPIA - PRACTICE MAKES BETTER, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 38(8), 1997, pp. 1493-1510
Purpose. To determine the nature and limits of visual improvement thro
ugh repetitive practice in human adults with naturally occurring ambly
opia. Methods. A key measure the authors used was a psychophysical est
imate of Vernier acuity; persons with amblyopia have marked deficits i
n Vernier acuity that are highly correlated with their loss of Snellen
acuity. The experiment consisted of three phases: pretraining measure
ments of Vernier acuity and a second task (either line-detection thres
holds or Snellen acuity) in each eye with the lines at two orientation
s; a training phase in which observers repetitively trained on the Ver
nier task at a specific line orientation until each had completed 4000
to 5000 trials; and posttraining measurements (identical to those in
the first phase). Two groups of amblyopic observers were tested: notic
e observers (n = 6), who had no experience in making psychophysical ju
dgments with their amblyopic eyes, and experienced observers (n = 5),
who had previous experience in making Vernier judgments with their amb
lyopic eyes (with the lines at a different orientation) using the sign
al-detection methodology. Results. The authors found that strong and s
ignificant improvement in Vernier acuity occurs in the trained orienta
tion in all observers. Learning was generally strongest at the trained
orientation but may partially have been transfer red to other orienta
tions (n = 4). Significant learning was transferred partially to the o
ther eye (at the trained orientation) in two observers with anisometro
pic amblyopia. Improvement in Vernier acuity did not transfer to an un
trained detection task. In two observers, the improvement in Vernier a
cuity was accompanied by a commensurate improvement in Snellen acuity.
Conclusions. Some adults with amblyopia retain a significant degree o
f neural plasticity. Although several observers (primarily novices) sh
owed evidence of generalized learning, several amblyopic patients show
ed evidence for improvement that was orientation and task specific. In
this latter group of observers, the improvement appeared to reflect a
lterations that were, at least in part, in early neural processes that
were orientation specific and were localized beyond the site of conve
rgence of the two eyes.