Ns. Williams et al., Rectal augmentation and stimulated gracilis anal neosphincter - A new approach in the management of fecal urgency and incontinence, DIS COL REC, 44(2), 2001, pp. 192-198
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was the development of a procedure which wou
ld successfully treat selected patients presenting with incapacitating urge
ncy and fecal incontinence. Some patients presenting with urgency and fecal
incontinence, with an intact anorectum but deficient sphincter mechanism,
have low rectal compliance. Management is problematic, because correction o
f the sphincter defect does not abolish the incapacitating urgency caused b
y rectal hypersensitivity. METHODS: This was a prospective study of three f
emale patients with urgency and fecal incontinence who underwent combined r
ectal augmentation using a segment of distal ileum and stimulated gracilis
anal neosphincter. All patients had low rectal volumes and two exhibited a
temporal relationship between high-amplitude (>60 mmHg) rectal pressure wav
es and urgency on prolonged ambulatory anorectal manometry. RESULTS: Urgenc
y was abolished and continence restored in all individuals. When the level
of stimulation was not optimal or had been discontinued, patients experienc
ed only passive incontinence with no urgency. Postoperative physiology reve
aled elevated thresholds to rectal distention and a reduction in the number
of high-amplitude rectal pressure waves in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Combine
d rectal augmentation with stimulated gracilis anal neosphincter may be of
benefit to some patients with distressing urgency and fecal incontinence no
t previously helped by current techniques.