Following the arguments concerning the problems of traditional forest econo
mics in Putt (2000), this article shows that transaction cost economics can
overcome some of the shortcomings of the main stream forest economics. The
public forestry, subsistence forestry, non-industrial private forestry, Ch
ina's share-holding forestry, and their revolutions are analyzed by the rel
ative transaction costs of labor, capital, land and forest products. Potent
ial implications of transaction cost economics in forest policy, including
regulated access to Commons, sustainable forestry criteria, ecological cert
ificates and land tenure decentralization, have also been discussed. (C) 20
01 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.