We examined the energy, nutrient, time, and habitat consequences of diet ch
oice by a generalist herbivore, the hispid cotton rat (Sigmodon hispidus) O
n the Texas coastal prairie. Benefit-cost and linear programming models wer
e developed and used to test several specific hypotheses about diet choice,
foraging strategy, and habitat use by cotton rats. Within cotton rat habit
at, there were significant differences among both seasons and habitat patch
es in the abundance and biomass of foods available. Monocot patches typical
ly were higher in standing crops of energy and nutrients than were either d
icot or mixed patches. Relative to available biomass and nutrients in dicot
foods, this cotton rat habitat was both spatially and temporally heterogen
eous and dynamic. Although the abundance of dicot foods in a habitat patch
did influence costs of foraging time, time costs of cotton rats foraging fo
r suitable foods did not decrease when standing crops of energy and nutrien
ts in these habitats increased. Higher requirements for energy and nutrient
s needed for lactation by reproductive cotton rats resulted in higher forag
ing costs than for nonreproductive female rats. A mixed diet incorporating
both monocot and dicot foods was nutritionally superior to either a monocot
-only diet or a dicot-only diet. A diet of only monocots would meet minimum
daily energy requirements and would not exceed either maximum daily digest
ive capacity or maximum daily foraging time, but it would not meet minimum
daily requirements for protein and phosphorus during reproduction. Converse
ly, a diet of only dicots would meet nutrient requirements for reproduction
but would exceed maximum daily foraging time. Mixing of monocot and dicot
plant parts in the diet met both net energy and nutritional requirements, a
nd increased foraging lime, as compared to a diet of only monocots. Diets o
f cotton rats foraging to maximize net energy intake each season differed f
rom the observed diets. Likewise, diets of cotton rats foraging to minimize
total daily foraging time differed from the observed diets. Thus, we concl
ude that reproductive females of this generalist herbivore neither maximize
d their energy nor minimized their time, but rather, consumed a mixed diet
to balance intake of requisite nutrients. Accordingly, a diet choice that i
ncluded a mixture of monocot and dicot foods was most efficient when foragi
ng occurred in a habitat having a mixture of monocot and dicot plants. Mixe
d patches provided higher energy and nutrient benefits to foraging cotton r
ats than did either monocot or dicot patches. Finally, we observed that rep
roductive female cotton rats concentrated their activities in mixed-patch h
abitats.