Purpose: The study goal was to assess the magnitude of change in generic an
d epilepsy-specific health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) instruments need
ed to exclude chance or error at various levels of certainty in patients wi
th medically refractory epilepsy.
Methods: Forty patients with temporal lobe epilepsy and clearly defined cri
teria of clinical stability received HRQOL measurements twice, 3 months apa
rt, using the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-89 and -31 (QOLIE-89 an
d QOLIE-31), Liverpool Impact of Epilepsy, adverse drug events, seizure sev
erity scales, and the Generic Health Utilities Index (HUI-III). Standard er
ror of measurement and test-retest reliability were obtained for all scales
and for QOLIE-89 subscales. Using the Reliable Change Index described by J
acobson and Truer, we assessed the magnitude of change required by HRQOL in
struments to be 90 and 95% certain that real change has occurred. as oppose
d to change due to chance or measurement error.
Results: Clinical features, point estimates and distribution of HRQOL measu
res, and test-retest reliability (all >0.70) were similar to those previous
ly reported. Score changes of +/- 13 points in QOLIE-89, +/- 15 in QOLIE-31
, +/-6.3 in Liverpool seizure severity-ictal, cll in Liverpool adverse drug
events, +/-0.25 in HUI-III, and +/-9.5 in impact of epilepsy exclude chanc
e or measurement error with 90% certainty. These correspond, respectively,
to 13, 15, 17, 18, 25, and 32% of the potential range of change of each ins
trument.
Conclusions: Threshold values for real change varied considerably among HRQ
OL tools but were relatively small for QOLIE-89, QOLIE-31, Liverpool Seizur
e Severity, and adverse drug events. In some instruments, even relatively l
arge changes cannot rule out chance or measurement error. The relation betw
een the Reliable Change Index and other measures of change and its distinct
ion from measures of minimum clinically important change are discussed.