Respiratory inductance plethysmography in healthy infants: a comparison ofthree calibration methods

Citation
Ka. Poole et al., Respiratory inductance plethysmography in healthy infants: a comparison ofthree calibration methods, EUR RESP J, 16(6), 2000, pp. 1084-1090
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","da verificare
Journal title
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
ISSN journal
09031936 → ACNP
Volume
16
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1084 - 1090
Database
ISI
SICI code
0903-1936(200012)16:6<1084:RIPIHI>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
Respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIP) measures respiration from body surface movements. Various techniques have been proposed for calibration i n order that RIP may be used quantitatively. These include calculation of t he proportionality constant of ribcage to abdominal volume change (K). The aims of this study were to 1) establish whether a fixed value off; could be used for calibration, and 2) compare this technique with multiple linear r egression (MLR and qualitative diagnostic calibration (QDC) in normal healt hy infants. Recordings of pneumotachograph (PNT) flow and RIP were made during quiet (Q S) and active sleep (AS) in 12 infants. The first 5 min in a sleep state we re used to calculate calibration factors, which were applied to subsequent validation date. The absolute percentage error between RIP and PNT tidal vo lumes was calculated. The percentage error was similar over a wide range of K during QS. However, K became more critical when breathing was out of phase. A standard for K o f 0.5 was chosen. There was good agreement between calibration methods duri ng QS and AS. In the first minute following calibration during QS, the mean absolute errors were 3.5, 4.1 and 5.3% for MLR, QDC and fixed K respective ly. The equivalent errors in AS were 11.5, 13.1 and 13.7% respectively. The simple fixed ratio method can be used to measure tidal volume with simi lar accuracy to multiple linear regression and qualitative diagnostic calib ration in healthy unsedated sleeping infants, although it remains to be val idated in other groups of infants, such as those with respiratory disease.