Endometrial receptivity in an in vitro fertilization program as assessed by spiral artery blood flow, endometrial thickness, endometrial volume, and uterine artery blood flow

Citation
Rl. Schild et al., Endometrial receptivity in an in vitro fertilization program as assessed by spiral artery blood flow, endometrial thickness, endometrial volume, and uterine artery blood flow, FERT STERIL, 75(2), 2001, pp. 361-366
Citations number
41
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
FERTILITY AND STERILITY
ISSN journal
00150282 → ACNP
Volume
75
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
361 - 366
Database
ISI
SICI code
0015-0282(200102)75:2<361:ERIAIV>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the role of sonographic parameters in assessing e ndometrial receptivity in an in vitro fertilization (IVF) program. Design: Prospective clinical study. Setting: University setting. Patient(s): One hundred thirty-five patients in our IVF program, selected p rospectively on the day of oocyte retrieval. Intervention(s): Transvaginal ultrasound examination was performed before o ocyte collection. Main Outcome Measure(s): Association between implantation rate and spiral a rtery blood flow (primary outcome measure) and between implantation rate an d endometrial measurements as well as uterine artery blood flow (secondary outcome measures). Result(s): Overall implantation rate was 23.7% per cycle. Subendometrial bl ood flow was detected in 113 (83.7%) cases, with pregnancy occurring in 21. 2%. Mean spiral artery pulsatility index values were 1.12 +/- 0.28 and 1.21 +/- 0.27 for nonconception and conception cycles, respectively. Nondetecta ble spiral artery blood flow was not associated with a lower implantation r ate. Neither endometrial thickness nor endometrial volume was correlated wi th the likelihood of successful implantation. Minimum endometrial thickness and volume associated with pregnancy were 6.9 mm and 1.59 mL, respectively . Conclusion(s): Neither Doppler sonography of the spiral or uterine arteries nor measurement of the endometrial thickness or volume allowed a reliable prediction of subsequent IVF outcome. (Fertil Steril((R)) 2001;75: 361-6. ( C)2001 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.).