Impact of intramural leiomyomata in patients with a normal endometrial cavity on in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycle outcome

Citation
Es. Surrey et al., Impact of intramural leiomyomata in patients with a normal endometrial cavity on in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycle outcome, FERT STERIL, 75(2), 2001, pp. 405-410
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
FERTILITY AND STERILITY
ISSN journal
00150282 → ACNP
Volume
75
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
405 - 410
Database
ISI
SICI code
0015-0282(200102)75:2<405:IOILIP>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
Objective: Assess the impact of intramural uterine leiomyomata and a normal endometrial cavity on IVF-ET cycle outcome. Design: Retrospective case-controlled analysis. Setting: Tertiary-care-assisted reproductive technology program. Patient(s): Three hundred ninety-nine consecutive fresh IVF-ET cycles were performed in patients with a normal precycle diagnostic hysteroscopy; patie nts were divided into four groups. Group 1: positive leiomyomata, age <40 y ears (n = 51 cycles); group 2: negative leiomyomata, age <40 years (n = 57 cycles); group 3: positive leiomyomata, age greater than or equal to 40 yea rs (n = 22 cycles); group 4: negative leiomyomata, age greater than or equa l to 40 years (n = 59 cycles). A subgroup of all group 2 patients aged 35-3 9 (group 2A, n = 113 cycles) was also evaluated as an additional control. Intervention(s): Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, IVF-ET. Main Outcome Measure(s): Implantation(IR), live birth (LBR) rates. Result(s): There were no significant differences in LBR among age-matched c ontrols: group 1 (49%) versus 2 (57.5%) or 2A (57%) and group 3 (40.9%) ver sus 4 (32.2%). IR was significantly lower in group 1 (21.4%) versus 2 (33.3 %) or 2A (33.9%) but not in group 3 (17.5%) versus 4 (11.6%). Implantation did not correlate with either mean leiomyoma diameter or volume. Conclusion(s): [1] LBR was not affected by the presence of intramural leiom yoma in IVF-ET patients with hysteroscopically normal endometrial cavities. [2] A significant decrease in IR was only noted in patients <40 years old. [3] Given the relatively high LBR in all groups, prophylactic surgical int ervention cannot be justified, but precycle hysteroscopy evaluation is reco mmended. (C)2001 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.