Intellectual monopoly on the marketplace of ideas is often lamented. Fixati
on on particular methods impedes market access of new ideas in economics. B
roadening of the methodological basis of the discipline will increase the p
robability of accomplishing research objectives. During the past decades, q
ualitative research strategies have been increasingly neglected. Where rela
ted disciplines aspire to an appropriate balance of quantitative and qualit
ative approaches, this discussion is just beginning in agricultural economi
cs.
Qualitative approaches which seem fertile for agricultural economic researc
h are case studies and participatory action research which have an independ
ent tradition in the field, ethnography which is applied in rural sociology
and organizational research, and grounded theory, ethnomethodology, and na
turalistic research. Qualitative case study research serves as an example f
or the possibilities, unanswered questions, and limitations of qualitative
research.
Case studies exist in different forms. With research, they are in use as me
thods of analysis and reporting, or choice of the object of study. Although
no standard procedure for case study research is available researchers agr
ee on the importance of triangulation. Quality criteria for qualitative res
earch are yet to be developed. A starting point are the traditional criteri
a, internal and external validity, reliability, and objectivity Credibility
, transferability, dependability, and confirmability are explained and disc
ussed as substitutes. Case studies oriented to these criteria are a valuabl
e complement to statistical and econometric analysis with the objective of
problem-solving research, development of new theory or testing and qualifyi
ng of existing theory.