As part of a paleoseismological investigation along the Bree fault scarp (w
estern border of the Roer Graben), various geophysical methods [electrical
profiling, electromagnetic (EM) profiling, refraction seismic tests, electr
ical tomography, ground-penetrating radar (GPR), and high-resolution reflec
tion seismic profiles] were used to locate and image an active fault zone i
n a depth range between a few decimeters to a few tt ns of meters. These ge
ophysical investigations, in parallel with geomorphological and geological
analyses, helped in the decision to locate trench excavations exposing the
fault surfaces. The results could then be checked with the observations in
four trenches excavated across the scarp. Geophysical methods pointed out a
nomalies at all sites of the fault position. The contrast of physical prope
rties (electrical resistivity and permittivity, seismic velocity) observed
between the two fault blocks is a result of a difference in the lithology o
f the juxtaposed soil layers and of a change in the water table depth acros
s the fault. Extremely fast techniques like electrical and EM profiling or
seismic refraction profiles localized the fault position within an accuracy
of a few meters. In a second step, more detailed methods (electrical tomog
raphy and CPR) more precisely imaged the fault zone and revealed some struc
tures that were observed in the trenches. Finally, one high-resolution refl
ection seismic profile imaged the displacement of the fault at depths as la
rge as 120 m and filled the gap between classical seismic reflection profil
es and the shallow geophysical techniques. Like all geophysical surveys, th
e quality of the data is strongly dependent on the geologic environment and
on the contrast of the physical properties between the juxtaposed formatio
ns. The combined use of various geophysical techniques is thus recommended
for fault mapping, particularly for a preliminary investigation when the ge
ological context is poorly defined.