In Part 1 of this research work, a description of the small-scale concentra
ted load test is presented. Unjointed and jointed (glued/unglued) particleb
oard samples were subjected to a mid-span concentrated load up to failure.
The failure loads were compared and conclusions were drawn with regard to t
he influence of gluing the T&G joints on the structures' resistance to conc
entrated loads.
The stiffness, considered to be the slope of the linear region of the load-
displacement chart has been calculated. Linear regression lines between fai
lure load and stiffness were sought. Relatively good correlation (R-2 = 0.8
8) was found for the unjointed samples, however, less good correlation (R-2
= 0.63) was found for the glued jointed samples and even worse correlation
(R-2 = 0.53) was found for the unglued jointed ones. Generally, the stiffn
ess can be considered as a useful indicator for the failure load and failur
e mode of the particleboard samples. For increased stiffness values the boa
rds tend to fail at higher loads and in a more brittle mode, providing a su
dden vertical drop in the load/displacement curves. At values over 456 N/mm
'catastrophic' failure modes (instant total failures) were observed (span
size of 450 mm and thickness of the boards of 18 mm). However, at values le
ss than 420 N/mm the failure mode was more ductile, described by 'smooth' p
ost failure curves. By gluing the joints the stiffness of the structure inc
reases significantly. The failure load also increases but not by an amount
that is statistically significant. The failure mode of glued jointed struct
ures seems to be more ductile when compared to unglued ones. This means tha
t after the maximum failure load has been achieved, the boards continue to
sustain the load for a longer period of time up to ultimate failure occurs.