Objectives: To determine the incidence and identify risk factors of critica
l incidents in an ICU.
Design: Prospective observational study of consecutive patients admit ted o
ver 1 year to an ICU. Critical incidents were recorded using predefined cri
teria. Their causes and consequences were analysed. The causes were classif
ied as technical failure, patient's underlying disease, or human errors (su
bclassified as planning, execution, or surveillance). The consequences were
classified as lethal, leading to sequelae, prolonging the ICU stay, minor,
or without consequences. The correlation between critical incidents and sp
ecific factors including patient's diagnosis and severity score, use of mon
itoring and therapeutic modalities was analysed by uni- and multivariate an
alysis.
Setting: An 11-bed multidisciplinary ICU in a non-university teaching hospi
tal.
Patients: 1024 consecutive patients admitted to the ICU.
Intervention: None.
Measurements and main results: The median length of ICU stay by the 1024 pa
tients was 1.9 days. Of the 777 critical incidents reported 2% were due to
technical failure and 67% to secondary to underlying disease. There were 24
1 human errors (31%) in 161 patients, evenly distributed among planning (n
= 75), execution (n = 88), and surveillance (n = 78). One error was lethal,
two led to sequelae, 26% prolonged ICU stay, and 57% were minor and 16% wi
thout consequence. Errors with significant consequences were related mainly
to planning. Human errors prolonged ICU stay by 425 patient-days, amountin
g to 15% of ICU time. Readmitted patients had more frequent and more severe
critical incidents than primarily admitted patients.
Conclusions: Critical incidents add morbidity, workload, and financial burd
en. A substantial proportion of them are related to human factors with dire
consequences. Efforts must focus on timely, appropriate care to avoid plan
ning and execution mishaps at the beginning of the ICU stay; surveillance i
ntensity must be maintained, specially after the fourth day.