S. Lakhanpal et al., Phase II study of 4-ipomeanol, a naturally occurring alkylating furan, in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, INV NEW DR, 19(1), 2001, pp. 69-76
Background/purpose: 4-Ipomeanol (IPO; NSC 394438), a naturally occurring fu
ran isolated from common sweet potatoes (Ipomoea batatas) infected with the
fungus Fusarium solani was the first agent to be developed by the National
Cancer Institute based on a biochemical-biological rationale as an antican
cer agent targeted specifically against lung cancer. Prior to clinical deve
lopment, IPO was shown to induce pulmonary toxicity in the lungs of several
mammalian species because the agent is metabolized to a highly reactive fu
ran epoxide by specific cytochrome P450 monooxygenases found in pulmonary C
lara cells and type II pneumocytes, which share biochemical features with b
ronchogenic carcinoma. However, instead of inducing the anticipated lung to
xicity in patients with lung cancer in disease-directed phase I studies, he
patotoxicity was the principal toxic effect of IPO in humans. Based on the
presumption that IPO may be preferentially activated by cytochrome P450 mon
ooxygenases in liver cells and biochemically-related hepatic malignancies,
a phase II study was conducted to determine the activity and evaluate the t
oxicity of IPO in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Patients
and methods: Nineteen patients with advanced measurable hepatocellular car
cinoma were enrolled on the phase II trial. All patients had an Eastern Coo
perative Oncology Group performance status of at least two, no evidence of
pulmonary dysfunction, and had either no prior treatment or minimal prior t
herapy. Patients were treated with IPO at a dose of either 1032 mg/m(2), wh
ich was the maximum tolerated and recommended phase II dose previously deri
ved for patients with normal hepatic function (15 patients) or 826 mg/m(2)
if they had serum bilirubin concentrations in the range of 2.0 to 3.0 mg/dL
(four patients). Treatment was repeated every three weeks. Objective tumor
response, the primary endpoint of the study, was assessed after every two
courses of treatment, and both pulmonary function and lung density were rig
orously monitored using successive pulmonary function testing and computeri
zed tomography. Results: All nineteen patients were evaluable for both resp
onse and toxicity. No major objective responses were observed. One patient
had a minor, brief reduction in lung metastases. Although marker lesions an
d overall disease remained stable for at least 12 and 24 months in three an
d two patients, respectively, the median time to progression was three mont
hs and the median survival was five months for all patients. The principal
toxicity was reversible elevations in hepatic transaminases, which occasion
ally resulted in dose reduction. No clinically-significant pulmonary toxici
ty was noted. Conclusion: IPO at a dose of either 826 or 1032 mg/m(2) admin
istered every three weeks did not demonstrate a relevant degree of clinical
activity against advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Further evaluations of
TO is not recommended for this disease.