Retention time of macerated alfalfa hay and silage in sheep

Citation
P. Savoie et al., Retention time of macerated alfalfa hay and silage in sheep, J ANIM SCI, 79(2), 2001, pp. 507-514
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE
ISSN journal
00218812 → ACNP
Volume
79
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
507 - 514
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-8812(200102)79:2<507:RTOMAH>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
Fresh alfalfa was mowed and conditioned mechanically at four levels: a cont rol (rubber rolls), macerated once (a single passage through three finely c orrugated rolls set at 1-mm clearance), macerated twice (two passages), and macerated thrice (three passages). Alfalfa was then field-wilted either fo r 45 h and conserved as chopped silage at 30% dry matter (DM) or for 94 h a nd stored as baled hay at 85% DM. The eight forage treatments (four mechani cal conditioning levels x two conservation systems) were fed to 24 sheep (t hree replications per treatment) during 5 wk. At the beginning of wk ii, a 15-g sample of chromium-mordanted forage (3.5% Cr) was fed to each sheep, a nd feces samples were collected at 30 different times over 7 d, between 10 h and 168 h after Cr ingestion. Four models were used to estimate the passa ge rates, the time delay, and the mean retention time (MRT). A two-compartm ent time-dependent model and a multicompartment model produced the best fit (average r(2) of 0.96) to represent the Cr concentration in the feces over time. When compared with alfalfa hay, alfalfa silage had a higher (P < 0.0 1) time-dependent turnover rate (0.0949 vs 0.0733/h), a lower (P = 0.03) ti me delay (9.1 vs 11 h), and a lower (P = 0.04) MRT (57.8 vs 64.4 h). Macera tion did not affect significantly (P > 0.10) the time delay or the MRT. How ever, the MRT of macerated alfalfa hay tended to be higher than the MRT of control hay. Experimental data based on marker concentration in the feces c an be used satisfactorily to assess differences in MRT between treatments, but they should be used with caution to estimate the partition of retention time within the gastrointestinal tract.