Comparison of Diadegma insulare (Hymenoptera : Ichneumonidae) and Microplitis plutellae (Hymenoptera : Braconidae) as biological control agents of Plutella xylostella (Leptidoptera : Plutellidae): Field parasitism, insecticide susceptibility, and host-searching
Jx. Xu et al., Comparison of Diadegma insulare (Hymenoptera : Ichneumonidae) and Microplitis plutellae (Hymenoptera : Braconidae) as biological control agents of Plutella xylostella (Leptidoptera : Plutellidae): Field parasitism, insecticide susceptibility, and host-searching, J ECON ENT, 94(1), 2001, pp. 14-20
Parasitism of Plutella xylostella (L.) third and fourth instars was evaluat
ed in a cabbage field in Geneva, NY, in 1999. Over the entire season, avera
ge parasitism was 33.6% for third instars and 53.6% for fourth instars, and
the main parasitoids were Diadegma insulare (Cresson) and Microplitis plut
ellae Muesbeck. In the early season, total parasitism was low and mainly ca
used by D. insulare. However, later in the season, parasitism reached >80%
for the forth instars and 50% for the third instars. Our survey indicated t
hat M. plutellae heavily parasitized P. xylostella and provided higher para
sitism rates than D. insulare in the late season. Comparison of these two s
pecies in laboratory bioassays indicated there were no significant differen
ces in susceptibility to four insecticides commonly used in crucifer fields
. For both parasitoids, an experience with P. xylostella on a damaged leaf
increased their host-searching efficacy. Compared with M. plutellae, D. ins
ulare was a better host-searcher both for the naive and the experienced adu
lts. Although both parasitoids can cause high mortality rates of P. xyloste
lla, D, insulare may be more suitable to be released in fields to enhance n
atural control against P. xylostella.