Evaluation of action thresholds and spinosad for lepidopteran pest management in Minnesota cabbage

Citation
Rl. Hines et Wd. Hutchison, Evaluation of action thresholds and spinosad for lepidopteran pest management in Minnesota cabbage, J ECON ENT, 94(1), 2001, pp. 190-196
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Entomology/Pest Control
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY
ISSN journal
00220493 → ACNP
Volume
94
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
190 - 196
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-0493(200102)94:1<190:EOATAS>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
Action thresholds, based on the percentage of plants infested, for the lepi dopteran pest complex in fresh-market cabbage Brassica oleracea variety cap itata capitata were evaluated in 1996 and 1997 in southern Minnesota. Three lepidopteran pests are common in Minnesota, including: the imported cabbag eworm, Pieris (=Artogeia) rapae (L.), diamondback moth, Plurella xylostella (L.), and the cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni (Hubner). Most of the thresh olds tested included all three pests. However, because T. ni is often the m ost consistent and damaging pest in Minnesota, two thresholds were based so lely on the percentage of plants infested with T. ni eggs and larvae. Actio n thresholds were also evaluated for their compatibility with a recently la belled biologically based insecticide, spinosad, and a conventional pyrethr oid, permethrin. Although all three lepidopteran pests were present in both years of the study. P. rapae provided most of the pest pressure in 1996, a nd T.,li nas most abundant in 1997. Compared with the 0% larval infestation treatment (approximately weekly sprays from early heading to harvest), all action thresholds resulted in less insecticide use (17-80%), while maintai ning high levels of marketability. Despite variable pest pressure between y ears, one of the thresholds based solely on T, ni (10% of plants infested w ith eggs or larvae) performed as well as each of the thresholds based on al l three species combined. For both years, and compared with a weekly spray schedule from early heading to harvest (average of 5.5 sprays per year), us e of the 10% T., ni egg or larval threshold resulted in an average of 36.5% (3.5 sprays) and 65% (2.0 sprays) fewer applications of spinosad and perme thrin, respectively, with no significant loss in marketability. The results indicate that a variety of incidence-based action thresholds can be used t o ensure the production of high-duality cabbage in the midwestern United St ates with only minimal applications of spinosad or permethrin.