Repellency of different plant extracts and commercial formulations used asprophylactic sprays to protect bagged grain against Tribolium castaneum - A field study
H. Chander et al., Repellency of different plant extracts and commercial formulations used asprophylactic sprays to protect bagged grain against Tribolium castaneum - A field study, J FD SCI M, 37(6), 2000, pp. 582-585
Nine agents, including acetone extracts of live plant materials, viz.. swee
t flag rhizomes (Acorus calamus L.). kut root (Saussurea lappa L.), curry l
eaf (Murraya sp), kinnow peel (Citrus nobilis X Citrus deliciosa) and turme
ric rhizomes (Curcuma longa L.). and crude mustard oil, two commercial neem
formulations (nimbicidin and repellin) and one synthetic pyrethroid (cyper
methrin) were evaluated at 1% level as bag treatments for the control of st
orage insects under warehouse conditions in a thrice replicated trial. The
changes were monitored at 2, 4 or 6 months of storage. Rice filled in untre
ated bags served as controls. The two-way analysis of variance of the insec
t counts per 100 g grains showed very highly significant differences due to
agents and durations of storage (p<0.001). The interaction between these t
reatments was also significant (p<0.05). The main effects were highly signi
ficant for the interaction. Based on the overall insect counts per 100 g gr
ains, cypermethrin and repellin were the most effective with counts of 3.4
and 4.7, respectively, followed by turmeric extract (9.5), nimbicidin and M
urraya extract (both 11.1). Acorus extract (13.4). and S. lappa extract (17
.1). Treatments of mustard oil and kinnow peel extract were the least effec
tive. Lower insect counts in most of the effective treatments were probably
due to their repellent action. Extracts of Murraya, turmeric. S. lappa and
nimbicidin showed good repellency against the test insect even after three
months of ageing under laboratory conditions, thereby substantiating the r
esults obtained under warehouse conditions.