Aims: To address the following questions: (1) Which words are preferred by
different groups of orofacial pain patients to describe their pain experien
ce (2) Is it possible, based on such descriptions, to obtain a clinical dif
ferential diagnosis in these patients? (3) Is there any relationship betwee
n the verbal description of pain and self-rated quality of life (QOL)? (4)
Can a pattern of modulation of pain language by affective variables (diffus
ion model) be recognized in orofacial pain patients, as is has in other chr
onic pain patients and (5) If so, what might be the clinical usefulness of
assessing pain language in these patients? Methods: A total of 332 consecut
ive orofacial pain patients filled out an Italian Pain Questionnaire (the I
talian analog of the McGill Pain Questionnaire) and were then divided into
6 diagnostic subgroups (sample 1) based on history and clinical findings. I
n a double-blind setting, the distribution of pain descriptors and indexes
was statistically evaluated. From sample 1, a randomly selected sample of 1
21 patients (sample 2) also filled out a QOL categorical scale. The results
of both tests in this sample were compared statistically. Results: Some si
gnificant differences among diagnostic subgroups were found for choice of d
escriptors and for pain intensity. When a patient's pain description was co
mpared to the corresponding self-evaluation of QOL, a self-perceived worsen
ing of QOL revealed a good correlation with an increase in the number of wo
rds chosen, pain intensity, and affective and sensory pain descriptors. A s
imilar significant association was found between self-assessed anxiety and/
or depression and the same items. Conclusion: Although trends in patients'
choice of descriptors were evident, differential diagnosis based on only a
pain questionnaire was not possible in the different groups of orofacial pa
in patients examined in this study. The present study suggests the presence
of a phenomenon of diffusion in the language of those patients who were ex
periencing a worsening of their QOL as a result of pain and consequent psyc
hologic distress. This observation can be of clinical usefulness by enhanci
ng the sensitivity of the clinician to the suffering and affective distress
experienced by the patient, and it also can be helpful in refining the the
rapeutic approach for each individual patient.