Covariational and goal-based approaches to social attribution have been tre
ated as competitive or incommensurable. This article integrates key aspects
of each approach. Four studies examined preferences for motivating factors
(or goals) and enabling factors (or preconditions) as explanations of inte
ntional actions. The studies manipulated (Studies 1-3) and measured (Study
4) the perceived covariation of these goal-based causes with target actions
. Causes that covaried with actions were preferred explanations, in contras
t with the goal-based view that motivating factors are generally preferred
to enabling factors. Combining goal-based beliefs and covariational reasoni
ng resolves problems faced by each individual approach and generates a nove
l explanatory typology that combines strengths of goal-based and covariatio
nal typologies.