A new model, partially based on the three most widely cited previous hypoth
eses, is proposed to explain the genesis of the Canary islands. From the ho
tspot hypothesis it retains the notion that the islands originated from a t
hermal anomaly in the mantle. From the propagating Fracture hypothesis it t
akes the critical role of regional fractures in the onset of magmatism. The
uplifted block hypothesis contributes with the notion that the islands are
in their present freeboard attitude due to the action of tectonic forces.
The main drawbacks of the three preceding hypotheses are solved within this
unifying approach: the thermal anomaly is an upper mantle residue from an
old plume, and therefore it does not carry (or does it in a highly diluted
form) the typical geophysical and geochemical plume signatures; the fractur
es are well developed on the continental and oceanic crust, but not in the
extremely thick sedimentary pile between the Canary Islands and Africa; and
the Canary islands uplift took place through transpressive shears, and not
by means of purely reverse faults. This unifying model, which integrates t
he thermal and tectonic histories of the lithosphere and the sublithospheri
c mantle, is considered to be a valid approach to a number of volcanic area
s where, as has been highlighted in recent years, pure hotspot or pure frac
ture models are found wanting to explain oceanic or (less frequently) conti
nental volcanic lines. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.