Causes and mobility of large volcanic landslides: application to Tenerife,Canary Islands

Citation
M. Hurlimann et al., Causes and mobility of large volcanic landslides: application to Tenerife,Canary Islands, J VOLCANOL, 103(1-4), 2000, pp. 121-134
Citations number
58
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Journal title
JOURNAL OF VOLCANOLOGY AND GEOTHERMAL RESEARCH
ISSN journal
03770273 → ACNP
Volume
103
Issue
1-4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
121 - 134
Database
ISI
SICI code
0377-0273(200012)103:1-4<121:CAMOLV>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Giant volcanic landslides are one of the most hazardous geological processe s due to their volume and velocity. Since the 1980 eruption and associated debris avalanche of Mount St. Helens hundreds of similar events have been r ecognised worldwide both on continental volcanoes and volcanic oceanic isla nds. However, the causes and mobility of these enormous mass movements rema in unresolved. Tenerife exhibits three voluminous subaerial valleys and a w ide offshore apron of landslide debris produced by recurrent flank failures with ages ranging from Upper Pliocene to Middle Pleistocene. We have selec ted the La Orotava landslide for analysis of its causes: and mobility using a variety of simple numerical models. First, the causes of the landslide h ave been evaluated using Limit Equilibrium Method and 2D Finite Difference techniques. Conventional parameters including hydrostatic pore pressure and material strength properties. together with three external processes. dike intrusion, caldera collapse and seismicity, have been incorporated into th e stability models. The results indicate that each of the external mechanis m studied is capable of initiating slope failures. However, we propose that a combination of these processes may be the most probable cause for giant volcanic landslides. Second, we have analysed the runout distance of the la ndslide using a simple model treating both the subaerial and submarine part s of the sliding path. The effect of the friction coefficient, drag forces and hydroplaning has been incorporated into the model. The results indicate that hydroplaning particularly can significantly increase the mobility of the landslide, which may reach runout distances greater than 70 km. The mod els presented are not considered definite and have mainly a conceptual purp ose. However, they provide a physical basis from which to better interpret these complex geologic phenomena and should be taken into account in the pr ediction of future events and the assessment of landslide related hazards. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.