The prognostic value of etoposide area under the curve (AUC) at first chemotherapy cycle in small cell lung cancer patients: a multicenter study of the groupe Lyon-Saint-Etienne d'Oncologie Thoracique (GLOT)
G. Freyer et al., The prognostic value of etoposide area under the curve (AUC) at first chemotherapy cycle in small cell lung cancer patients: a multicenter study of the groupe Lyon-Saint-Etienne d'Oncologie Thoracique (GLOT), LUNG CANC, 31(2-3), 2001, pp. 247-256
Purpose: To assess the potential relationships between systemic exposure to
doxorubicin, etoposide and ifosfamide at first chemotherapy cycle and ther
apeutic effect, tumor response. toxicity. and survival. in small cell lung
cancer (SCLC) patients. Patients and methods: Twenty-four patients referred
to five different centers with either thorax-limited or metastatic SCLC en
tered the study. All but one received two induction courses of the 3 day-AV
I (doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2) day 1. etoposide 120 mg/m(2) day 1, 2, 3, ifosfam
ide 2000 mg/m(2) day 1, 2) regimen. Individual plasma samples were collecte
d at the first course and complete concentration data on 24 courses were av
ailable. Drugs exposures were estimated using a population pharmacokinetic
method and expressed as clearance (Cl), area under the curve (AUC). and AUC
-intensity (AUC/cycle duration). Responding patients received thoracic irra
diation + concomitant cisplatinum-etoposide (limited disease) or Four more
courses of AVI (extensive disease). The impact of exposure parameters on ha
ematological toxicity, tumor response and overall survival was assessed usi
ng linear regression, the Mann-Whitney U-test and the log-rank test, Kaplan
Meier estimation. respectively. Results: Twenty-three patients could be ev
aluated for response and survival. We found no relationship between drug ex
posure and haematological toxicity but all patients had received Granulocyt
e-Colony Stimulating Factor support. Tumor response was marginally influenc
ed by ifosfamide: AUG. In patients with etoposide AUC > 254.8 mg h/l. I-yea
r survival was 50.0 vs. 9.1% in the other group (median 11.4 vs. 7.1 months
, P = 0.02), with respect to established prognostic factors. In patients wi
th extensive disease only (n = 15), 1-year survival was 42.9 vs. 0% (median
11.3 vs. 5.3 months. P = 0.01). Conclusion: This: study strongly suggests
that SCLC patients should benefit from sufficient etoposide exposure at fir
st cycle to improve survival. Adaptative control based on plasma concentrat
ion measurements should be tested in further studies assessing various poly
chemotherapy regimens. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science ireland Ltd. All rights re
served.