We quantitatively reviewed human sex differences in the magnitude and varia
bility of duration judgments. Data from 4,794 females and 4,688 males yield
ed 87 effect size estimates of magnitude and 28 of variability. The overall
sex difference in duration judgment magnitude was small but statistically
significant. It was moderated by whether study participants knew in advance
(prospective paradigm) or only later (retrospective paradigm) that they wo
uld be required to judge duration. Although prospective judgments showed no
overall sex effect, some levels of moderator variables showed a small but
statistically significant effect. Retrospective judgments showed a larger s
ubjective-to-objective duration ratio for females than for males, and sever
al variables moderated this effect. Females' judgments also showed more int
ersubject variability than did males' judgments. Relative to males, females
sustain attention to time more in the prospective paradigm and have better
episodic memory in the retrospective paradigm.