In contemporary Mexico, political elections have turned into fundamentally
free, fair, competitive, and clean contexts. Yet, in political debate, the
idea prevails that the country's transition to democracy is still on its wa
y. How can we explain this apparent divergence? First, as the article argue
s, empirical disagreements over the state of democratization persist due to
the veiled nature of the Mexican transition. Second, normative disagreemen
ts over the endpoints of democratization have raised the standards a comple
te transition must fulfill. Third, the idea of an ongoing transition has tu
rned into political common sense. It has become part of 'ordinary' language
. Accordingly, political actors may use it in many different ways but still
harbour an illusion of shared meaning and common ground.