Based on the similarity of brain areas lesioned in neglect and those activa
ted by spatial working memory (WM) tasks in normals, we hypothesized that n
eglect may involve spatial WM impairments. A left neglect patient with righ
t inferior frontal and basal ganglia damage performed cancellation tasks, m
aking either highly visible marks (to provide a reminder of visited items),
or invisible marks (so only spatial WM could represent cancelled items). I
nvisible marks led to repeated cancellations for targets that differed only
in location, but not for targets with memorable unique identities, suggest
ing a deficit of spatial WM, with non-spatial WM spared. Neglect was greate
r for cancellation with invisible marks, consistent with a role for deficie
nt spatial WM in cancellation deficits, but contrary to account solely in t
erms of attention capture by salient visible marks made in ipsilesional spa
ce. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.