Predicting delivery date by ultrasound and last menstrual period in early gestation

Citation
P. Taipale et V. Hiilesmaa, Predicting delivery date by ultrasound and last menstrual period in early gestation, OBSTET GYN, 97(2), 2001, pp. 189-194
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
ISSN journal
00297844 → ACNP
Volume
97
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
189 - 194
Database
ISI
SICI code
0029-7844(200102)97:2<189:PDDBUA>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
Objective: To compare last menstrual period and ultrasonography in predicti ng delivery date. Methods: We used ultrasound to scan 17,221 nonselected singleton pregnancie s at 8-16 completed weeks. The last menstrual period (LMP) was considered c ertain in 13,541 and uncertain in 3680 cases. The duration of pregnancy fro m the scan to the day of spontaneous delivery was predicted by crown-rump l ength, biparietal diameter (BPD), and femur length (FL) using linear regres sion models, and the results were compared with estimates based on LMP. Results: At all gestational ages, ultrasound was superior to certain LMP in predicting the day of delivery by at least 1.7 days. When deliveries befor e 37 weeks were excluded, crown-rump length measurement of 15-60 mm (corres ponding to 8-12.5 weeks) had the lowest prediction error of 7.3 days. After that time, BPD (at least 21 mm) showed a similar error (7.3 days) and was more precise than crown-rump length. Femur length was slightly less accurat e than crown-rump length or BPD. Regression models using a combination of a ny two or three ultrasonic variables did not improve accuracy of prediction . When ultrasound was used instead of certain LMP, the number of postterm p regnancies decreased from 10.3% to 2.7% (P < .001). Conclusion: Ultrasound was more accurate than LMP in dating, and when it wa s used the number of postterm pregnancies decreased. Crown-rump length of 1 5-60 mm was superior to BPD, but then BPD (at least 21 mm) was more precise . Combining more than one ultrasonic measurements did not improve dating ac curacy. (Obstet Gynecol 2001;97:189-94. (C) 2001 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.).