Retroperitoneal drainage after complete paraaortic lymphadenectomy for gynecologic cancer: A randomized trial

Objective: To determine the relationship between retroperitoneal drainage a fter complete para-aortic lymphadenectomy for gynecologic cancer and subseq uent development of lymphocysts. Methods: Eighty women undergoing complete para-aortic lymphadenectomy up to the level of the left renal vein for ovarian (n = 43) or cervical carcinom a (n = 37) were randomly assigned to receive drainage or no drainage of the para-aortic area. Most of patients had pelvic drainage. Abdominopelvic ult rasonography was done 8 to 12 days after surgery. postoperative complicatio ns, duration of hospital stay, and characteristics of asymptomatic lymphocy sts were studied. Results: Forty-two women had para-aortic drainage and 38 did not. Complicat ions occurred in 15 patients who had drainage and in 5 patients who did not have drainage (36% versus 13%; P < .02). Three patients (8%) in the undrai ned group had complications potentially related to drainage (symptomatic ly mphocysts or ascites) compared with 11 (26%) in the drained group (<chi>(2) = 4.6; P < .05). Median duration of the hospital stay was 9 days in the un drained group and 11 days in the drained group (P < .03). The number of asy mptomatic pars-aortic lymphocysts detected during the ultrasonography was 9 (24%) in the undrained and 2 (5%) in the drained group (chi (2) = 4.6; P < .05). Conclusions: The number of asymptomatic para-aortic lymphocysts was higher in patients who did not undergo drainage, but morbidity and the duration of hospitalization were increased in these patients. Routine drainage of the retroperitoneum after pam-aortic lymphadenectomy should be abandoned. (Obst et Gynecol 2001;97:243-7. (C) 2001 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.).