The role of "skillful means" is examined in relation to the important Mahay
ana philosopher Nagarjuna, and it is argued that the doctrine of "emptiness
" is best understood as a critical reflection on the nature of Buddhist pra
xis. Whereas traditional Western scholarship sees Nagarjuna as struggling w
ith certain metaphysical problems, a "skillful means" reading situates his
philosophy within a debate about the nature and efficacy of Buddhist practi
ce. Thus, a "skillful means" reading of Nagarjuna does not ask what it mean
s for causality, the self, or consciousness to be "empty" in a very general
sense, but how "emptiness" relates to the soteriological practices of Budd
hism and what it means for these practices to be "empty" of inherent nature
. It is argued that this situates Nagarjuna's philosophy within a highly cr
itical, self-reflective movement in the Buddhist tradition.