Artificial incubation of muscovy duck eggs: Why some eggs hatch and othersdo not

Citation
Mas. Harun et al., Artificial incubation of muscovy duck eggs: Why some eggs hatch and othersdo not, POULTRY SCI, 80(2), 2001, pp. 219-224
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences
Journal title
POULTRY SCIENCE
ISSN journal
00325791 → ACNP
Volume
80
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
219 - 224
Database
ISI
SICI code
0032-5791(200102)80:2<219:AIOMDE>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
This study was designed to gain insight into the influence of spraying and cooling, during artificial incubation, on the embryo metabolic rate and hat ching ability of Muscovy duck eggs. Three times a week 93 incubated eggs we re sprayed and cooled for 0.5 h at room temperature. Daily embryo metabolic rate was measured in 30 eggs with a water vapor conductance ranging from 1 .15 to 2.07 mg/day.kPa. Egg weight ranged from 63.73 to 84.52 g; length and breadth ranged from 59.6 to 66.4 mm and 43.2 to 48.2 mm, respectively. Acc ording to observed hatching ability, eggs were classified by three categori es: eggs that hatched normally; eggs that were assisted during hatching, an d nonhatched eggs. Five ducklings were assisted during hatching. Four duckl ings died on Day 31, two on Day 32, and two on Day 34. Two functions were d erived by discriminant analysis and accounted for 100% of the variation amo ng the three categories of hatching ability. Collectively, these functions were able to classify 93.3% of the eggs in the correct hatching category. E gg length and metabolic rate at Days 21 and 28 of incubation were the most important predictor variables of the two functions. The results obtained in the present study indicate that an incubation temperature of 37.5 C with s praying and cooling seems to be beneficial for larger eggs.