Clinical equivalence of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate in combination (50/100 mu g twice daily) when administered via a chlorofluorocarbon-free metered dose inhaler or dry powder inhaler to patients with mild-to-moderate asthma

Citation
Ed. Bateman et al., Clinical equivalence of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate in combination (50/100 mu g twice daily) when administered via a chlorofluorocarbon-free metered dose inhaler or dry powder inhaler to patients with mild-to-moderate asthma, RESP MED, 95(2), 2001, pp. 136-146
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","da verificare
Journal title
RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
ISSN journal
09546111 → ACNP
Volume
95
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
136 - 146
Database
ISI
SICI code
0954-6111(200102)95:2<136:CEOSPI>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
This multi-centre, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group s tudy was designed to investigate the hypothesis of equivalent efficacy and comparable safety of two inhaled presentations of salmeterol/fluticasone pr opionate combination product (SALM/FP) 50/100 mug administered twice daily to patients with mild-to-moderate asthma for 12 weeks. The delivery systems were a 25/50 mug strength hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered-dose inhaler (MD I) and a Diskus(TM) inhaler (50/100 mug strength). A third group received F P 100 mug twice daily via a chlorofluorocarbon MDI (50 mug strength). A tot al of 497 patients aged 11-79 years with reversible airways obstruction who were symptomatic on inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy and had room for improvement in lung function were randomized to treatment in a double-blind , parallel-group design (SALM/FP MDI: n=165; SALM/FP Diskus(TM): n=167; FP MDI: n=165) for 12 weeks. A total of 383 patients completed the study accor ding to the protocol. According to the primary efficacy variable, increase in mean morning PEF ov er weeks 1-12, the two inhaled presentations of SALM/FP were clinically equ ivalent (adjusted mean increases 43 and 46 l min(-1); treatment difference 3 l min(-1); 95% confidence interval: -6 to 11 l min(-1)). Equivalence was also demonstrated by all secondary efficacy measures. The SALM/FP MDI was s ignificantly superior to the FP MDI for increase in mean morning PEF (treat ment difference 19 l min(-1); P < 0.001) and for all secondary measures exc ept FEV1 and symptom-free nights. There was no significant difference betwe en the groups with respect to adverse events and serum cortisol levels. These results demonstrate that the SALM/FP 25/50 <mu>g HFA MDI (two inhalat ions twice daily) is clinically equivalent to the SALM/FP 50/100 mug Diskus (TM) (one inhalation twice daily). Patients switching to SALM/FP from other MDI-based asthma treatments may now do so without a change of delivery dev ice.