Lockups are an increasingly important element of M&A deals in the United St
ates. We present, for the first time, descriptive data on lockup incidence,
trends, and their relationship with Delaware case law. Prior commentators
have used theoretical models to argue that lockups should have little or no
impact on allocational efficiency in the market for corporate control. We
use data from twelve years of M&A activity in the United States to show tha
t prior models have little predictive power in real-world transactions. We
then offer a new theoretical model of lockups that includes six "buy-side"
distortions: agency costs, tan effects, informational effects, switching co
sts, reputational effects, and endowment effects for bidders. The implicati
ons of this new model suggest that courts and corporate boards should scrut
inize lockups more closely than prior commentators have advocated.