Objective: The objective was to design and validate a disease-specific
outcomes instrument for use in conductive hearing loss (CHL). Study D
esign: The study was a retrospective survey of 47 patients recently tr
eated for CHL with either a hearing aid or surgery. Patients were test
ed with the newly designed instrument (the Hearing Satisfaction Scale
[HSS]), previously validated hearing-specific instruments, and a gener
ic quality-of-life instrument. Setting: The study was performed in an
academic tertiary referral center. Main Outcome Measures: These includ
ed test-retest reliability, internal consistency reliability, content
validity, criterion validity, and construct validity of the HSS. Resul
ts: Test-retest reliability (r = 0.72, p <0.001) and internal consiste
ncy reliability were adequate (Cronbach's alpha was 0.83 and 0.74 for
the two subscales of the HSS). Criterion validity for individual items
was adequate (r = 0.45, p = 0.02) using audiometric data as the crite
rion standard. Construct validity was also high using results from oth
er instruments; both convergent and divergent validity of the HSS was
demonstrated. In addition, the HSS demonstrated the ability to differe
ntially discriminate between subgroups when grouped by level of hearin
g loss. Conclusions: The HSS is a valid and reliable instrument for us
e in outcomes research on conductive hearing loss.