The indications for growth hormone (GH) treatment in non-GH-deficient short
children are in debate, with some arguing that this treatment does not bel
ong solely in the medical domain. We describe three different approaches to
the issue, and argue that neither a disease-oriented nor client-oriented a
pproach is sufficient. Both lead to withdrawal of medical interventions or
to an undesirable application.
Conclusion: An approach focusing on suffering as an indication for treatmen
t of short stature is the most appropriate. The challenge is to develop pro
per tools by which to evaluate suffering and the efficacy of GH treatment i
n these children in order to relieve or prevent suffering.