Prediction of node-negative breast cancer outcome by histologic grading and S-phase analysis by flow cytometry - An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study (2192)
Dl. Page et al., Prediction of node-negative breast cancer outcome by histologic grading and S-phase analysis by flow cytometry - An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study (2192), AM J CL ONC, 24(1), 2001, pp. 10-18
Citations number
67
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS
Histologic evaluation and reporting of invasive breast cancer has effective
ly used Nottingham combined histologic grade (NCHG). This approach to predi
ct outcome in invasive breast cancer has not been tested in multicenter coo
perative trials. Histologic slides from selected breast cancer cases entere
d on node-negative Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trials were assigned
grades. Two pathologists evaluated cases for NCHG defined from differentiat
ion. mitotic index, and nuclear grade. The study population consisted of se
parate samples from low- and high-risk strata, where low risk was estrogen
receptor positive with a tumor size of less than 3 cm and high risk was est
rogen receptor negative or tumor size greater than or equal to 3 cm. The ra
te of agreement was generally good, with 80% of cases classified the same f
or mitotic count and 76% of the cases classified the same for combined grad
e. There were no cases disagreeing from the lowest to the highest of the th
ree categories. The median follow-up is 11.6 years, but for analysis of sur
vival, this was truncated at 5 years. Mitotic index and combined grade as a
ssessed by both pathologists showed significant associations with survival.
High combined histologic grade was predictive for response to cyclophospha
mide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil (CMF) with survival differences at 5 years
of 30% in the treated high-grade patients over the un-treated patients. Ov
erall, it is clear that pathologists can have close agreement in assignment
of combined histologic grades, with highly significant prediction in univa
riate and borderline significance in multivariate analysis in prognosticati
on of time to recurrence as well as survival. Thus, stratification used in
these trials was highly prognostic as hoped, leaving a role for histologic
grading in these relatively large tumors, more powerful than S-phase analys
is in this series. In the subgroups of high-risk patients randomized betwee
n CMF and observation, there was a suggestion that the high-combined-grade
group was predictive of treatment efficacy. We conclude that a combined his
tologic grade with defined criteria may be reliably assigned by practiced p
athologists using readily available criteria, and that the measure may be o
f use in prognostication and prediction of therapeutic responsiveness when
done in a technically ideal fashion.