Computed tomographic colonography and conventional colonoscopy for colon diseases: A prospective, blinded study

Citation
G. Spinzi et al., Computed tomographic colonography and conventional colonoscopy for colon diseases: A prospective, blinded study, AM J GASTRO, 96(2), 2001, pp. 394-400
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenerology and Hepatology
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
ISSN journal
00029270 → ACNP
Volume
96
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
394 - 400
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9270(200102)96:2<394:CTCACC>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Computed tomographic (CT) colonography or virtual colonoscopy i s a new diagnostic method for the colon and rectum, developed on the basis of spiral computed axial tomography and employing virtual reality technolog y. The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of CT colonography compared with colonoscopy in a pros pective, blinded study in one single institution in Italy. METHODS: Ninety-nine patients randomly selected among those attending the o pen-access endoscopy unit for diagnostic colonoscopy underwent colonoscopy and spiral CT. The images obtained were transmitted to generate the virtual colonoscopy pictures. A supervisor compared the results with the findings of conventional colonoscopy. RESULTS: CT colonography diagnosed seven of eight tumors, one being missed because the patient had been inadequately prepared. In 28 patients, CT colo nography identified 26 polyps of 45 (57.8% sensitivity, 92.6% specificity, 86.7% positive predictive value), regardless of their size. The sensitivity in detecting colonic polyps was 31.8% (7/22) in the first 25 cases and 91. 6% (11/12)in the last 20 patients. CT colonography missed one flat adenoma, some angioectasias and colonic lesions because of portal hypertension in o ne patient, Crohn's disease ulcers in two patients, and ulcerative colitis lesions in three. CONCLUSIONS: CT c olonography shows poor sensitivity for identifying colonic polyps and does not always detect neoplastic lesions. Flat lesions are impossible to see by this method.