Correlation between admission laboratory values, early abdominal computed tomography, and severe complications of gallstone pancreatitis

Citation
K. Meek et al., Correlation between admission laboratory values, early abdominal computed tomography, and severe complications of gallstone pancreatitis, AM J SURG, 180(6), 2000, pp. 556-560
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
ISSN journal
00029610 → ACNP
Volume
180
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
556 - 560
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9610(200012)180:6<556:CBALVE>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Our previous study demonstrated that Balthazar grade D or E pan creatitis on early abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan correlated with severe complications of gallstone pancreatitis (GP). OBJECTIVE: TO compare the efficacy of individual admission laboratory crite ria, multiple criteria scoring systems and CT scan for predicting severe co mplications of GP. METHODS: Consecutively admitted patients with GP underwent selective early CT scanning (<72 hours). Ail patients were prospectively monitored for seve re complications. RESULTS: Of the 66 patients studied, 21 (32%) did not undergo for early CT scanning and underwent cholecystectomy with no complications. Forty-five pa tients (68%) had an early abdominal CT scan. Of the 12 patients with grade E pancreatitis, 6 (50%) developed severe complications versus only 2 of 33 (6%) with grade A to D pancreatitis (P = 0.002). A significant correlation was found between admission white blood cell count <greater than or equal t o>14.5 x 10(9)/L and grade E pancreatitis on early CT scan (P = 0.002). How ever, admission glucose greater than or equal to 150 mg/dL was the best pre dictor of complications (sensitivity 100%, negative predictive value 100%). CONCLUSIONS: Although Balthazar grade E on early CT scan correlates with se vere complications of GP, admission glucose greater than or equal to 150 mg /dL has a better sensitivity and negative predictive value, is quicker to u se, and is more cost-effective as a prognostic indicator. (C) 2001 by Excer pta Medica, Inc.