Objective: Ventricular catheter placement is a common neurosurgical procedu
re often resulting in inaccurate intraventricular positioning. We conducted
a comparison of the accuracy of endoscopic and conventional ventricular ca
theter placement in adults. Methods: A retrospective analysis of data was p
erformed on 37 consecutive patients undergoing ventriculo-peritoneal shunt
(VPS) insertion with endoscopy and 40 randomly selected, unmatched patients
undergoing VPS insertion without endoscopy, for the treatment of hydroceph
alus of varied etiology, A grading system for catheter tip position was dev
eloped consisting of five intraventricular zones, V1-V5, and three intrapar
enchymal zones,A, B, C. Zones V1 for the frontal approaches and V1 or V2 fo
r the occipital approaches were the optimal catheter tip locations. Postope
rative scans of each patient were used to grade the accuracy of ventricular
catheter placement. Results: Seventy-six percent of all endoscopic ventric
ular catheters were in zone V1 and 100% were within zones V1-V3, No endosco
pically inserted catheters were observed in zones V4, V5 or intraparenchyma
lly, Thirty-eight percent of the conventionally placed catheters were in zo
ne V1, 53% in zones V1-3 and 15% intraparenchymally. There was a statistica
lly significant difference in the percentage of catheters in optimal locati
on versus in any other location, favoring endoscopic guidance (p<0.001). Co
nclusion: We conclude that endoscopic ventricular catheter placement provid
es improved positioning accuracy than conventional techniques.