Mono-, di-, tri- ... polynucleosome, oligonucleosome, nucleofilament, nucleoplasmin: a terminological comment

Authors
Citation
E. Battaglia, Mono-, di-, tri- ... polynucleosome, oligonucleosome, nucleofilament, nucleoplasmin: a terminological comment, CARYOLOGIA, 53(3-4), 2000, pp. 169-173
Citations number
64
Categorie Soggetti
Biology
Journal title
CARYOLOGIA
ISSN journal
00087114 → ACNP
Volume
53
Issue
3-4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
169 - 173
Database
ISI
SICI code
0008-7114(200007/12)53:3-4<169:MDT.PO>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
The term nucleosome has been reinvented by OUDET et al. (1975), ignoring or disregarding earlier proposals of the same term, to indicate the structura l unit of the chromatin. Since this term means 'nuclear body', it is very i nadequate to qualify a particular organization of the chromatin. An identical critique is valid regarding all nucleosome derivatives (mono-, di-, tri-... polynucleosome, oligonucleosome, supernucleosome) and the rel ated terms nucleofilament (FINCH and KLUG 1976) and nucleoplasmin (LASKEY a nd EARNSHAW 1980). Owing to their linguistical weakness, an alternative terminology is brought to the attention of biologists.