Therapeutic strategies for soft tissue malignancies in adults. Results of the CAD soft tissue tumor register study and approaches to improvement in quality of treatment

Citation
T. Junginger et al., Therapeutic strategies for soft tissue malignancies in adults. Results of the CAD soft tissue tumor register study and approaches to improvement in quality of treatment, CHIRURG, 72(2), 2001, pp. 138-148
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
CHIRURG
ISSN journal
00094722 → ACNP
Volume
72
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
138 - 148
Database
ISI
SICI code
0009-4722(200102)72:2<138:TSFSTM>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
Introduction: This study, carried out by the Surgical Oncology Working Grou p (CAO) of the German Society for Surgery was performed to analyse the stra tegies in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas in adults. Methods: In a pe riod of 19 months the data on 292 patients suffering from soft tissue sarco mas, treated in 99 surgical departments in Germany, were analysed prospecti vely. A special questionnaire was developed including pretherapeutic biopsy , previous treatment, definitive surgical treatment, combined modality appr oach and histopathological results. Results: Thirty-nine per cent of the tu mours were treated in university hospitals, 36% in medical centres, 24% in regional hospitals. During the observation period two patients were treated on average (median) by each hospital. Limb-sparing treatment was performed in 96% of the extremity tumours. There was no significant difference in th e frequency of RO resections between the different hospitals. At the univer sity hospitals local extended operations and additive measures were used mo re often. The indication for adjuvant radiotherapy differed: after compartm ental resection, adjuvant radiotherapy was performed in 39% of cases (19/49 ); after wide-excision of high-grade tumours, in 45% of cases (20/44) no ad juvant radiotherapy was necessary. In spite of less radical treatment in tu mours of the trunk, additional radiotherapy was not more frequently perform ed. Conclusion: To improve the quality in the treatment of soft tissue sarc omas it seems to be of great importance to avoid inadequate initial treatme nt (18%), to respect the rules of oncological surgery (tumour rupture in 7% of cases), to improve the histopathological examination (no R classificati on in 5-12%) and to develop guidelines for multimodality treatment.