Decentralization has swept across the developing world in recent years. Alt
hough the speed and scope of the shift toward more decentralized practices
is striking, decentralization is neither inevitable nor irreversible. Rathe
r, it faces enormous political obstacles and can be subject to serious setb
acks. This article accounts for attempts by national politicians to thwart
decentralization in two countries that recently adopted some of the most si
gnificant decentralizing changes in their respective regions: Argentina and
the Philippines. Based on fieldwork in each country, it suggests that even
after the political decision to decentralize has been made, national polit
icians may face deep-seated incentives to preserve centralized control over
fiscal policy. In Argentina, President Carlos Menem partially reversed the
previous decentralization of revenue because fiscally-independent provinci
al governors were a challenge to his political interests and capabilities.
In the Philippines, legislators attempted to reverse and then circumvent de
centralization since it threatened their status as brokers claiming persona
l credit for negotiating fiscal transfers from the centre. The article iden
tifies an intermediate outcome in both countries, according to which decent
ralizing policies are neither entirely reversed nor implemented as initiall
y designed.