Incidence of blindness in southern Germany between 1990 and 1998

Citation
C. Trautner et al., Incidence of blindness in southern Germany between 1990 and 1998, DIABETOLOG, 44(2), 2001, pp. 147-150
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology, Metabolism & Nutrition","Endocrinology, Nutrition & Metabolism
Journal title
DIABETOLOGIA
ISSN journal
0012186X → ACNP
Volume
44
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
147 - 150
Database
ISI
SICI code
0012-186X(200102)44:2<147:IOBISG>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
Aims/hypothesis. A reduction of diabetes-related blindness by at least one third was declared a primary objective for Europe in 1989 (St. Vincent Decl aration). To ascertain a potential change of incidence rates, we collected data on blindness in a German district (population: about 5 million) over 9 years. Methods. We obtained complete lists of newly registered blindness-allowance recipients between 1990 and 1998 and population data on Wurttemberg-Hohenz ollern, Germany. We estimated incidence rates of blindness in the general p opulation and the diabetic population. To ascertain any time trend, we appl ied Poisson regression models. Results. There were 6371 newly registered blindness allowance recipients (1 990-1998). Of these 67% were women and 27% had diabetes. Mean age was 71.7 years. Standardised results in the diabetic population (incidence rates per 100 000 person-years; standard: diabetic population; 95% CI): 1990: 72 (61 ;82); 1991: 88 (76;100); 1992. 77 (67;88); 1993: 82 (71;93); 1994: 62 (53;7 2); 1995: 82 (71;93); 1996: 70 (60;80); 1997: 69 (59;79); 1998: 59 (49,68). The Poisson model estimated a 3% decrease of incident blindness in the dia betic population for each year (Relative risk per year 0.97; CI: 0.95; 0.99 ). No significant change could be observed in the non-diabetic population ( Relative risk: 0.99; CI: 0.98; 1.00). Relative risks for each year varied b etween sub-groups according to sex, diabetic status and cause of blindness between 0.94 and 1.01. Conclusion/interpretation. A slight reduction of incident blindness could b e shown but a reduction by one third has not been reached. Several possible sources of bias in the data have to be considered.